Shame and Brenè Brown

Two months ago a colleague sent the two TED talks below to me and I spent a short morning tea break watching them. A fortnight later, I’d devoured Brenè Brown’s first book on shame, and will soon take to her second.

Too often, I find so many of us suffer from vulnerability hangovers – a space of negativity and inner-shaming when we reveal something a little too close to the bone. It may be a sacred memory, or a flirtatious smile, or something as innocent as a fart joke. Whatever it is, the wrath of self-hatred that can follow a brief release of vulnerability can be deeply crippling and powerful. I suffer from these a lot. I know a bunch of people who do. Barely a day goes by where I don’t have some moment of desperate self-punishment.

Why is shame and self-hatred so prevalent in Western society? Why is it so powerful? How do we perpetuate it? How do we live it with it? The questions are fascinating and reap complex answers. It’s an endless search that has meant a pleasing metaxis of some of my favourite non-fiction ramblings: self-improvement, spirituality, psychology and neuroscience.

I’m glad to be having this conversation with a few colleagues right now, and I thought it was worth sharing here too. Grab a cup of tea and have a watch.

Follow your bliss

Every week for years now I’ve met with one group of kids or another to learn about drama. These sessions start just after school, and they’re any age from twelve upwards. These young people are bright, ambitious, and often incredibly funny. They share stories before we get down to the workshop proper. They wearily list off the amount of assignments that are due, count off the number of the extra-curricula activities that each have a public outcome, and they wander and how they’ll ever get through the stress of it all. When you teach a kid for a couple of years, you see the stress get more and more defined. They get thinner, they show up to class less. They worry. The stakes only get higher as they get closer to adulthood. One wrong move could ostensibly jeopardise their entire future.

Lucky, the work-until-you-burn-out model of business and the worry-about-outcomes-constantly methodology stop when you turn eighteen and graduate high school.

At some point you’ve got to stop reaching for other people’s goal posts. At some point you’ve got to turn to yourself and ask, ‘hang on, what do I want to do?’ You should give your response to this question more weight than anybody else’s opinion: your parents, your teachers, your friends, your mentors. You are the best authority on you. Even if you’re going to go make a mistake or put yourself in danger, you might just need to do that to learn something valuable, or to grow into the version of yourself that you want to be.

When I was in year twelve, I walked into my career counsellors office. She drew a line through my first two preferences for studying at university: arts, and sweetly suggested I apply myself to areas that will ensure a more stable living. It seems comical that at the highest levels of education we’re contradicting a message that we’re taught from kindergarten: the things that you have don’t make you happy. The money that you earn isn’t a reflection of who you are. It’s a powerful illusion to think otherwise, and one that can leave you bereft of joy, meaning, and growth.

Do it. Today.

(Yep, this is a sign.)

Off the buds

None of the futurists, as far as I know, ever imagined white strings suspended from our ears. Not Orwell, nor Bradbury or Huxley. The idea of paper-thin pads that displayed reams of electronic information was popular throughout most twentieth century science-fiction. It seems commonplace. So much so that we’ve ceased to be even slightly amazed at the wonder of it anymore. Orwell and company could clearly imagine our sight being taken from us by such machines, but didn’t dare to imagine ear buds. Bradbury’s vision of a home cinema: with blaring sound and light from every walled surface covering your lounge room, is sinister, but not nearly as troubling as the subtle mundanity of two harmless white wires, tucked securely and humbly into your ear.

In recent years I’ve listened to my iPhone every chance I have. Any task that is mundane, any trip that is longer than thirty seconds, any time, any where, I stick my headphones in my ears. My argument was productivity. I don’t listen to that much music. I mostly listen to podcasts and audiobooks, rich with information and ‘helpful’ knowledge. A chance to keep learning on my ‘down time’. What else is there for me to listen to while I’m grocery shopping/walking to my meeting/washing up/driving?

Turns out a lot. By pure accident my wife took our entire collection of headphones with her on a recent trip and I’ve been left without customised artificial sound for the first time in years. I’ve had ample opportunity to buy some more but haven’t, because I’ve actually enjoyed the thinking time. My brain has stretched. I’ve listened in on conversations on public transport, a past time I had long forgotten the value of. I’ve ended up reading more, but only by a tad. Mostly I’ve just been thinking, getting used to my brain again. In recent times it feels as though we’ve become strangers.

I don’t feel like I’ve ever put myself in danger by adorning headphones, but it’s hard to argue that it doesn’t shut you off from the rest of the world. It not only takes your ears but your brain as well. Even I, headphone addict that I was, couldn’t manage to go through a transaction while still having headphones in my ears. The idea seemed too rude. It’s another way of not interacting with the world, or with yourself.

So let this obnoxious reminder of the superiority of the ‘unplugged’ life drive you to a few days off the buds. Before, ultimately, I find myself attached to them once more, arguing that I need to listen to this podcast on neuroscience and/or video games. Because, of course, they have us, the future is here, we gave it to ourselves, and our children will be born wrapped in white wire.

The Upside of Death

I’ve been listening a lot lately to Dan Carlin and his podcast ‘Hardcore History‘. He began his latest episode concerning the 12th century Wrath of the Kahns, by commenting on a particular stance that historians have taken to this ancient holocaust. If someone were to write a book today, Carlin argues, on the upside of the Third Reich, you would get a lot of attention. In America, where folks are far more invested in their history than in Australia, there would be protests, a lot of radio talkback and so on. This is because the deaths caused by the holocaust happened relatively recently. When we turn our attention to more ancient genocides, we lose the value on human life. The Kahns wiped out millions of people. Alexander the Great and Julius Ceasar killed countless. Yet we look at these men as great men. In fact, if we were to quote Joseph Stalin (and you know, why wouldn’t you?), we’d find a particular piece of profundity: ‘One death is a tragedy. A million is a statistic.’

Carlin makes a forceful argument for holding on to the sense of tragedy that occurs with any seismic shift of history. If we lose that sense of tragedy, then we’re in danger of celebrating tyrants. It’s a logical jump from this argument to suggest that such celebration can lay a dangerous foundation for history to repeat itself.

I can see Carlin’s point, but I’ve been thinking about this whole matter a lot lately. When is it right to let go of grief? Letting go of loss and transcending it is one of the most profound spiritual practises any human being can have. Carlin’s right in saying that we always need to look at history from both sides. But do we always need to weep for the lost? If we commit ourselves to that, then won’t we be shedding tears forever? And wouldn’t we, in fact, not be living the lives that those that died sacrificed themselves for?

I’ve deleted and re-typed this next paragraph a couple of times. It feels incredibly sinful to say. But it’s true. I have difficulty having emotion at ANZAC Day ceremonies. I feel a distant but mostly forgettable pain at the deaths of war. Hell, it only takes me ten minutes to forget about a local death that I may have seen on the news, happening within my city. The logical inference from this would appear to be that I’m a psychopath.

Let me make a case for my defence before you lock me up. I do feel some emotion. But I’m outrageously and selfishly human in how I go about feeling that. The true weight of ANZAC day only hit me in the last couple of years when I realised that I was the age that young men were shipped off to war to fight. I thought of my friends and I getting on a boat to go to the other side of the world to die. The thought shook me. I understood the importance of the day. Similarly, when I imagine war scenarios now, I have to imagine them relative to my own life to feel any kind of sadness. I’d say that’s pretty normal.

My thoughts are further complicated by the spiritual aspect of this over the historical. We are living in an age where we fear death. And it’s warping our image of life. It’s a curse of the modern age that we don’t seem to accept that people die all the time. Many philosophers and spiritual thinkers have commented on this. Prior to this age of medicine, it was common place to lose infants to disease and death before they had lived for a year. Living beyond forty was old age. We’ve become obsessed with staying young. The fear of death is irrational and inevitably finite.

I always go back to when I was writing April’s Fool. I interviewed dozens of people on the subject of grief. One interview was markedly different from all the others. A relative of the central young man who had passed showed little to no grief about twelve months after the passing. She had spent a lot of years working as a funeral director. The resolution I saw in her attitude was staggering. ‘I’m here to look after the living,’ she said. ‘People die. It’s awful and sad, but it happens all the time. We were lucky to have the time with the passed person that we did. Now they’re gone. One day, I’ll be gone. That’s how it works. Now, we look after the living.’ Despite my best efforts, I didn’t feel as though I could incorporate this interview into the play. It was too wildly different from every other person I’d interviewed. I still struggle with weather this anomaly was the most unusual because it was the most cold, or the most enlightened.

The spiritual thinkers I tend to listen to speak openly about death. In Buddhism, we’re taught non-attachment. Non-attachment to life and to our earthly, limited bodies. Even Christianity, which currently defends ‘the right to life’ with occasionally militant gusto, promises the concept of eternal life. Meaning that death is meaningless. It is a thing that occurs, and will always occur.

This doesn’t stop it being sad, but it’s way more complicated (and simple) than just crying tears. It gets easier with time, as Dan Carlin has noted. We need to remember death, but not fear it, or run away from it. I’ve recently discovered this piece of Shakespeare, from Cymbeline. And it’s quickly becoming one of my favourites:

Fear no more the heat o’ th’ sun

Nor the furious winter’s rages;

Thou thy worldly task hast done,

Home art gone, and ta’en thy wages.

Golden lads and girls all must,

As chimney-sweepers, come to dust.

Fear no more the frown o’ th’ great;

Thou art past the tyrant’s stroke.

Care no more to clothe and eat;

To thee the reed is as the oak.

The sceptre, learning physic, must

All follows this and comes to dust.

Fear no more the lightning flash,

Nor th’ all-dreaded thunder-stone,

Fear not slander, censure rash;

Thou hast finish’d joy and moan.

All lovers young, all lovers must

Consign to thee and come to dust.

 

Enlightenment at 10

 

Emily is a ratbag of a kid who is not at all averse to bullying. In my weekly Saturday drama class designed for those aged between eight and ten, she rips about the church hall like a rocket-fueled court jester, letting her voice bounce around the chamber as she loudly declares: ‘My name is Plant!’ or some other nonsense. So I am a little surprised when Emily leads the class in Buddhist meditation.

We begin by sitting in a circle. Emily has taken her usual place beside me. I am waiting for the conversational dust to settle when she pipes up. ‘Look!’ she says, ‘This is how Buddhist’s sit!’

Emily is cross legged with her palms turned outwards in her lap. She is scant on details, but she assures us she has met Buddhist monks, who have taught her an important game. The goal of the game is to breathe ten breaths without thinking about anything else but the breath. To do this, you inwardly chant to yourself: ‘One breath in, one breath out, two breaths in, two breaths out.’

‘I’ve gotten to three!’ she proudly boasts, ‘but only the bestest Buddhists get to ten. It’s really hard.’ I suggest we all take part in the game. The others are more than eager. What follows is four minutes of the most intense but peaceful meditation I have ever been a part of. Silence stretches through the circle, precious and present as a breeze.

I open my eyes and peak at the group of still bodies before me. It’s remarkable. Many of these students take this class because their behavior is difficult at school. I spy Bradley, a boy who finds it difficult to go about his life without shaking his right hand vigorously, sitting in perfect stillness along with every other one of his peers.

Once complete, the kids are eager to play it again. So we do. Most claim they are able to get to four or five. We all laugh at the obscure things our minds interrupt us with: food, television shows, school work or family. Bradley quietly remarks: ‘I find it easy to stop word thoughts, but pictures are much harder.’ The class nod in agreement.

I feel tremendously ill-equipped. I am sitting amongst wise and peaceful minds. I found it difficult to get to two. I dream of the lofty Nirvana-esque heights of four and five.

The class then proceeds as usual, although Bradley is a bit more open to working with girls this week, and Emily is now more calm than usual. A few times she becomes too excitable and interrupts my instructions to the class. ‘Emily,’ I say, ‘Go Buddhist.’ And she smiles happily and collapses in a straight meditational posture, measuring her breath until I ask her to stand up.

Excited by the story of the morning, I call my father later that afternoon. Dad used to be an eccentric primary school teacher for many years. Now he’s just eccentric. This kind of story isn’t new to him. When he discovered how much his year seven class enjoyed meditating one day, it became part of every morning routine for years after. The kids would regularly give him feedback on how much they enjoyed the practice.

He also tells of an activity where he would hand a single Smartie to every student, get them to close their eyes and put it in their mouth. The winner was the student who could make the Smartie last the longest. What ensued was a marathon lolly-savoring event.

Kids would emerge from this excited about the levels of taste and imagery they encountered. The cynic would perhaps say it was because of the free sugar-coated chocolate treat, but I’m sure this is only partly true.

I approach my Wednesday classes hoping to replicate Saturday’s successful session. I had considerably lower expectations. My Wednesday classes are high school age.

The first class is made up of early adolescents, and are not enthusiastic when I propose the exercise. They have difficulty sitting still and drawing their attention inward. When I ask them to focus on their breath, I am met with the sound of a dragon-like breathing beside me, which then receives many giggles from the class. I abandon the exercise, promising to return to it next week. The students groan.

The second class, made up of senior students, are more receptive to the idea, but find it difficult. Like me, they can only scratch the surface of one or two breaths before their mind interrupts. Many report that they simply want to fall asleep, too exhausted from final exams and university application forms to be able to contemplate anything but slumber once their eyes are closed.

Was I closest to spiritual enlightenment before I was twelve? This idea certainly isn’t new. In fact, much of Buddhist practice points towards a ‘child-like’ understanding of the world. I feel slightly cheated, to be honest. I was told that this whole ‘grown up’ thing was a brilliant idea. If I had refused this, would I now be a blissful guru?

It seems we lose more than our innocence, warmth, decency and (quite often) virginity in the harshest of our teenage years. We lose the ability to escape. Forget Nirvana or Eastern enlightenment, but simply the power to turn off is lost. We’re driven to perform, to crack a joke that makes our classmates giggle, intrinsically earning us acceptance and social power.

We emerge from these years, if my class is an indication, exhausted and robbed of a stillness that we mistook in our more innocent youth to be innate. It would seem that nothing seems more natural to a ten year old than sitting still and examining the mind. My younger class were absolute masters at it.

At best, we can hope to learn from the young and their earnest approach to life. At worst, we can dismiss it as a useless skill with no practical aptitude. I plan to ask Emily to lead us in meditational practice again. Her guaranteed calmness for the next hour is worth the five minute sacrifice alone.

Until then, if anybody needs me, I’ll be perched on the nearest hill, sucking a Smartie.

 

Proudly powered by WordPress
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.